Wednesday, April 28, 2010

Cons on trial

I have to admit that I am not much of a fan of Peter Milliken, the Speaker in the House but he was recently between a rock and a hard place and he did the best he could with a rotten situation.

The issue that he was deciding was whether Canadians and parliamentarians have a right to know if the governing party can treat them like sheep.

The issue was the detainee issue. I am not going to go into the issue because I figure if you are smart enough to read this blog, you will already know the issue.

Milliken's ruling was that the government was in contempt of parliament but he did not o as far as to say that. He told the government to get their act together and work out something with the opposition with in the next two weeks.

Of course, if the government had any integrity at all they would have worked this out long before Pete's ruling.

Have I suggested in the past that the Cons are corrupt, bereft of ideas and fundamental decency? If not, I will say it now.

Saturday, April 24, 2010

Funny coincidence?

When Larry O'Brien was being questioned about his questionable affair with respect to the Kilrea stink, one name in particular popped up. The Cons patronage boss for the Ottawa area was John "Screamer" Baird. It as alleged that Baird met with O'Brien at Hy's to discuss Kilrea. Baird denied it of course but it turned out that they did meet, however informally.

In 2009 "Rehab" Jaffer claims he met with a representative of a cabinet minister to discuss $135 million in infrastructure money for one of his clients. The minister was... Screamer Baird.

A coincidence?

Thursday, April 22, 2010

Where are the Tories taking the country?

In the 2008/09/10 economic meltdown, the boogieman under the bed and the thing that we knew but did not talk about, was derivatives. It is estimated that there are $2 trillion (that is TRILLION) in derivatives that have been ignored by Wall Street, Bay Street and governments and those derivatives are going to come back to bit our collective butts.

And let's not be too smug about this, our Canadian banks are just as exposed to the toxic derivatives as any one else.

So what does the collected brain trust on Parliament Hill do about it?

They propose that derivatives should be sold on the open market just like IBM or Apple. That was they can spread out the pain when derivatives get called?

This is LUNACY!!!!!

Monday, April 19, 2010

Nuts? You don't say!

If it wasn't for the fact that city council is playing with $2.2 BILLION of tax dollars they would almost be laughable.

What a sweet job it must be to run a city. If you run out of money or just want more, you pass a budget that raises taxes. And the suckers that pass for citizens just pay it. If you ever run into a situation where you have more money that you need you just create some new way to spend it.

The largest line item in the 2010 budget is salaries and benefits. If you wanted to cut costs that would be a logical place to do it. But no... council votes 12-8 to keep the status quo and everybody is happy except a few hundred thousand taxpayers. But who cares about them? Right?

Even if you flat-lined the salaries of all city employees, including unionized ones (which will never happen in my lifetime), the costs will still go up because, low and behold, the 2010 budget states that the number of Full-time equivalents will raise from 13,966.65 to 1 4,122.86 from 2009 to 2010. Since 2008 the number of FTEs has gone up by 380.71.

Can you say dumb???

Saturday, April 17, 2010

Easter has it right

Wayne Easter asked a question in the Commons on Friday.  It went something like this:  "Why, when a senior diplomat like Richard Colvin comes forward with information on the Afghan detainees, does the government dismiss him as dealing in innuendo, but when some third rate private dick make a statement that a junior minister may have done something wrong, the government not only takes it at face value but you dump the minister?

Wayne has asked the crucial question that brings into crystal clear focus the complete lack of credibility of President Steve.

Monday, April 12, 2010

What's that you say?

Helena Guergis has stated that the allegations leveled at her are "baseless and unfounded".

What allegations would that be, Helena?

From the CBC, "In an email to The Canadian Press on Sunday, Guergis said she requested that the allegations are dealt with "as quickly as due process will allow."
Due process?  Funny words to use for state secrets?

Saturday, April 10, 2010

Bye, bye Steve

Good move Steve.  Helena was an anvil around your ankle and she had to go.  Too bad you didn't come clean when you announced her ouster in your press conference.

You can be said to be strategic by your minions but, in reality, you are sapping out.  By referring the issue about which you just learned to the RCMP, you think that your no comment will be sufficient.   Wrong!

For the sake of clarity, the RCMP has to one day announce what they are investigating and if they find no evidence then they will be accused of a cover up. And given their track record of late, the allegations will be justified.

Mr. President -  Steve - you are a one-person wrecking ball.  It is time for you to go.  Please.

Friday, April 9, 2010

Worse than Helena?

The Helena/Rahim Affair misunderstanding(s) are out of control.  As sordid as their lives are, the real BIG loser in this whole thing is President Steve.  It is one thing to be perceived as supporting his ministers but when do you give it up?

I can't help wondering what Bill Casey thinks of Harper's defense of Helena?  After all, Bill was banished from the whole geesly party for voting against a government bill.

Harper is looking like a real loser.

Now comes the story that Steve's reaction to the pardoning (three years ago) of a sex offender flies in the face of a plan put in place, also three years ago, by Stockboy Day.

Not only does Harper see parliament as irrelevant, he now sees his own government as irrelevant.  Sounds a bit familiar to historians.

Wednesday, April 7, 2010

UNCLE!!!!

At some point in time Helena and Rahim need to call UNCLE and slink off back to Alberta, from whence they came.

Between the two of them they share the IQ of a dead badger and that may be an insult to the badger.

And while I am at it, let me send a note to Liberal Marlene Jennings. Helena is down for the count and is starting to look a little sympathetic. Let her up off the mat for a few seconds before you slap her down again.

Saturday, April 3, 2010

At least someone's relieved

The story out of the rarefied air at RCMP HQ is that Bill Elliot, the only Mountie that doesn't wear red, is staying on as Commissioner for a bit longer.

That is good news for the folks at Transport Canada.

When Billy was ADM at TC he set about to screw up the department and seemed to relish in the role. He ruined the careers of many a fine public servant by treating them as cattle. He ignored internal problems and created new one all by his lonesome.

Bill Elliot - the Peter Principal personified.